House Bill Would Hurt American Fisheries and Fishermen

Proposed policy undercuts efforts to rebuild U.S. fish populations

House Bill Would Hurt American Fisheries
Oregon coast

H.R. 200 would turn the clock back on fishery management efforts that have rebuilt 43 fish populations since 2000.

© The Pew Charitable Trusts

As I wrote in a prior blog post, a bill pending in the U.S. House of Representatives threatens to reverse considerable progress on improving the health of U.S. fish populations and stabilizing the businesses and coastal communities that depend on them.

H.R. 200 is the latest attempt by some members of Congress to weaken the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act—the law governing marine fishery management in federal waters. Two similar bills considered by the House in 2014 and 2015 failed to garner support in the U.S. Senate.

Like its predecessors, H.R. 200 would turn the clock back on fishery management efforts that have rebuilt 43 fish populations since 2000. If enacted, the legislation would undermine plans to rebuild vulnerable fish populations and would increase the risk of overfishing.

To ensure healthy populations of fish for future generations of American fishermen, seafood consumers, and ocean users, Congress must maintain our nation’s strong commitment to science-based fisheries management that prevents overfishing and restores fish populations to healthy levels. Policymakers should also consider ways to encourage fishery managers to use existing science to better protect fish habitat, conserve forage fish, and reduce bycatch (the unintended catch of nontarget fish and other wildlife).

H.R. 200 would not meet these pressing goals. Read Pew’s review of H.R. 200 for a closer examination of the proposed revisions to the Magnuson-Stevens Act and of what’s at stake for our oceans, our fish, and our economy.

Ted Morton leads fisheries work at the federal level for The Pew Charitable Trusts.

This post was updated Aug. 1, 2017 to reflect rebuilt fish populations as listed in NOAA’s June 30, 2017, “Status of Stocks” update.


States of Innovation

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Red Grouper
Red Grouper
Issue Brief

Federal Bill Would Be Giant Step Backward for U.S. Fish Populations

H.R. 200 threatens years of progress in rebuilding the nation’s fisheries

Quick View
Issue Brief

Instead of addressing the problems, H.R. 200 would undermine the core conservation provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act—requirements to prevent overfishing and rebuild depleted fish stocks—while compromising the health and stability of U.S. fish populations and threatening the livelihoods of millions of Americans.