Best Practices for State Oversight of Drug Compounding

Best Practices for State Oversight of Drug Compounding
Best Practices for State Oversight of Drug Compounding

In 2014, Pew convened an advisory committee of state regulators and experts to examine state oversight of compounding and develop best practices. The committee reviewed several regulatory topics, including inspections of compounding pharmacies, requirements for quality, expectations for pharmacist training, and compounding without a prescription. The committee also discussed how states should harmonize these requirements with federal law and regulations, particularly on issues such as definition and recognition of the new outsourcing facility category.

Based on the advisory committee process, this document identifies the best practices that are most meaningful to patient safety and the most achievable—recognizing, however, that state funding may place limitations on oversight systems. The best practices provide a resource to state regulators, policymakers, and interested stakeholders who are reviewing oversight practices, and also support greater harmonization across states—a valuable pursuit, given the interstate movement of compounded drugs, to ensure evenly-applied oversight and help counter an incentive for businesses to locate in states with less rigorous regulations.

Best Practices

  • Application of U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) quality standards on compounding.
  • Training in sterile compounding for pharmacists who perform or supervise it.
  • Annual inspections of facilities that perform sterile compounding.
  • State mechanisms, such as separate licensure, to identify and apply specific standards to facilities performing sterile compounding.
  • Recognition and definition of outsourcing facilities in a manner aligned with federal law.
  • Harmonization of policies on compounding without prescriptions with federal law.
  • Meaningful oversight of sterile compounding that occurs in physicians’ offices.
  • Mechanisms to track the compounding activities conducted by pharmacies within the state.

Best Practices for State Oversight of Drug Compounding offers policy recommendations for important areas of oversight (e.g., regulations, licensure, and inspection). For information on similarities and differences in state policies, read our complementary report, National Assessment of State Oversight of Sterile Drug Compounding.

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.

prescription medicine
prescription medicine
Article

Reports Recommend Strong State Policies on Drug Compounding

A look at state regulation and oversight

Quick View
Article

Compounded medications—drugs made by pharmacists, not pharmaceutical manufacturers—grabbed the nation’s attention in 2012, when tainted injections were linked to 64 deaths. In the wake of this incident, Congress and the public demanded proper oversight and better safeguards for compounded medicines.