Fish Dependence: The Increasing Reliance of the EU on Fish from Elsewhere

Fish Dependence: The Increasing Reliance of the EU on Fish from Elsewhere


This report, authored by OCEAN2012 and nef, is an update of the Fish Dependence report published in July 2010. It includes figures for self-sufficiency levels and fish dependence days in 2011 for all EU27 Member States.

This updated report includes:

  • a comparison between the 2011 and 2010 results, illustrating the extent to which the EU is becoming ever more dependent on fish from other regions;
  • new shares of catch in non-EU waters for the United Kingdom, Denmark, Sweden, Germancy and the Netherlands.

Read the briefing in English / Français / Deutsch / Italiano / Português / Español 


European Union (EU) fish stocks are in an unprecedentedly poor state yet fish consumption throughout Europe remains high. The EU has been able to maintain and even expand its levels of consumption by sourcing fish from other regions of the globe, both through the catches of its distant-water fleet and imports. This report highlights Europe's increasing reliance on fish products originating from external waters for its fish supplies, and provides pointers towards a more sustainable future for dwindling global fish stocks.


The New Economics Foundation (nef) has estimated the degree of ‘self-sufficiency' in fish consumption achieved by the EU as a whole and for each of its Member States; self-sufficiency is defined as the capacity of EU Member States to meet demand for fish from their own waters. We have expressed the degree of self-sufficiency in the form of a ‘fish dependence day'. Based on a Member State's or region's total annual fish consumption, the fish dependency day is the date in the calendar when it would start to depend on fish from elsewhere because its own supplies were depleted.

For the EU as a whole this is now 2 July, indicating that one-half of fish consumed in the EU is sourced from non-EU waters. Last year it was 9 July, which indicates that there has been a further decline of almost 200,000 tonnes of fisheries products over 12 months. Since 2000, the EU's fish dependence day has fallen earlier and earlier in the year and is now more than one month earlier than in 2000, revealing a continuously increasing level of fish dependence.

Of course, Member States with little or no access to EU waters, such as Austria, Slovakia and Slovenia, become fish dependent earlier in the year. Surprisingly, though, this is also the case for some Member States with greater access to EU waters. These include Spain, Portugal, Italy, Germany and France – all of whom source more than one-half of their fish from non-EU waters.

Our calculations include domestic aquaculture (fish farming) in EU countries, a growing enterprise that has served to marginally offset the overexploitation of EU fish stocks but has not halted or reversed the upward trend in fish dependence. If we discount aquaculture, the EU's fish dependence day moves forward to 7 June; for big aquaculture producers such as Spain, France, Italy and Greece, their respective national fish dependence day would occur more than one month earlier.eum-fish-dependence-workers

In a context of finite resources and growing populations, the current EU model is unsustainable. The EU's increasing fish dependence has implications for the sustainability of fish stocks globally, which are also overfished, and for the communities that depend on them.

The main message of this report is that rising fish consumption in a context of declining stocks is environmentally unviable and socially unfair. The EU has highly productive waters that have the potential to sustain a long-term and stable supply of fish, jobs and related social and economic benefits, but only if its fish resources are managed responsibly.

The reform of the EU's Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) offers a perfect opportunity to put the structures in place to turn this situation around. To transform the management of the EU's marine resources, the new CFP needs to provide a policy framework that will restore marine ecosystems to healthy levels and deliver a fair allocation of resources. At a minimum this will require the following actions.

  • Reduce capacity in line with the available resources; improve data collection, transparency and reporting; and prioritise scientific advice in determining catch quotas.
  • Create a context in which being profitable is aligned with doing the right thing, by making access to resources conditional on social and environmental criteria.
  • Promote responsible consumption among all EU consumers, and implement measures that are conducive to more responsible fishing outside EU waters.
  • Use public funds to deliver social and environmental goods by investing in environmentally constructive measures, research, and stakeholder involvement, as well as enforcing sustainable quotas and practices.

In order for this to happen, policy-makers need to look beyond the short-term costs that could result from reform and give priority to the long-term benefits that healthy marine resources will provide.

Read the report:

Spotlight on Mental Health

Composite image of modern city network communication concept

Learn the Basics of Broadband from Our Limited Series

Sign up for our four-week email course on Broadband Basics

Quick View

How does broadband internet reach our homes, phones, and tablets? What kind of infrastructure connects us all together? What are the major barriers to broadband access for American communities?

Pills illustration
Pills illustration

What Is Antibiotic Resistance—and How Can We Fight It?

Sign up for our four-week email series The Race Against Resistance.

Quick View

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, also known as “superbugs,” are a major threat to modern medicine. But how does resistance work, and what can we do to slow the spread? Read personal stories, expert accounts, and more for the answers to those questions in our four-week email series: Slowing Superbugs.

Explore Pew’s new and improved
Fiscal 50 interactive

Your state's stats are more accessible than ever with our new and improved Fiscal 50 interactive:

  • Maps, trends, and customizable charts
  • 50-state rankings
  • Analysis of what it all means
  • Shareable graphics and downloadable data
  • Proven fiscal policy strategies


Welcome to the new Fiscal 50

Key changes include:

  • State pages that help you keep track of trends in your home state and provide national and regional context.
  • Interactive indicator pages with highly customizable and shareable data visualizations.
  • A Budget Threads feature that offers Pew’s read on the latest state fiscal news.

Learn more about the new and improved Fiscal 50.