Juveniles in Custody for Noncriminal Acts

Interactive shows state-by-state breakdown for probation violations and status offenses, such as truancy and running away

Juveniles in Custody for Noncriminal Acts
Overview
A data visualization from The Pew Charitable Trusts

Juvenile Confinement Across the Nation

Pie chartNearly a quarter of the 48,043 juveniles held in residential facilities across the U.S. on a single day in 2015 were confined for status offenses or technical violations of supervision, according to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement from the Department of Justice’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. This marks the largest share of youth held for these acts since collection of these data began in 1997.

The proportion of juveniles confined for these types of offenses varies considerably by state. Some states — including Georgia, Kansas, and Utah — have recently adopted changes to policies and practices aimed at reducing the number of youth held for low-level offenses.

This interactive uses data for the 50 states on the confinement of juveniles in each jurisdiction by percentage, number, and rate per 100,000 youth.

{{ chartTitle }}

{{ currentState }}

 Back to All States

The data shown reflect {{ currentState }}’s percentage, rate, and number of youth confined for status offenses or technical violations of supervision. Percentage is the share of confined youth held for noncriminal acts; rate is the number of juveniles held for these behaviors per 100,000 youth in the jurisdiction, and number is the count of youth confined for status offenses or technical violations.

{{ currentState }} reported no confined youth held for status offenses or technical violations of supervision in 2015.

  • Status offenses
  • Technical violations
State Percent Rate Count
{{ state.stateAbbrev }} {{ formatNumPct(state['pct' + currentIndicator]) }} {{ formatNum(state['rate' + currentIndicator]) }} {{ formatNum(state['num' + currentIndicator]) }}
* Based on small number of youth in confinement (greater than 19, fewer than 100)
Note: The District of Columbia is omitted from this analysis because complete data on youth confinement in the city in 2015 were not available.
Source: Pew’s analysis of data from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement. The data presented include all youth who were in juvenile residential facilities, such as group homes, boot camps, long-term secure facilities, and other settings, on Oct. 28, 2015, before or after adjudication, except those in the District of Columbia, who were omitted because of data limitations.

OUR WORK

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.