A New Double Standard for EU Fisheries?

Amid changes to by-catch definitions, ministers cannot ignore CFP requirements when setting 2019 fishing limits

A New Double Standard for EU Fisheries?
Fisheries
Management of cod and other species in the European Union is complex because populations are divided into various stocks, depending on location, and subject to a range of catch limits. The process has been further complicated this year by new approaches by regulators to measuring sustainability.
Francis Dean/Getty Images

With the European Union facing a 2020 deadline to end overfishing, measuring progress remains a complex task. Trends generally point in the right direction, and quantifiable progress has been made over the past decade to reduce fishing pressure and restore fish stocks.

But at the same time, the data in the annual reports produced for the European Commission show that overfishing persists and that the problems are stubborn and multilayered. Further complicating matters, the Commission has designated an increased share of stocks as by-catch—typically the unwanted fish caught when fishing for targeted species—and set lower management objectives for those stocks.

The Commission’s latest “Communication”—the June statement outlining policy on fishing opportunities for next year—includes new ways to measure progress toward more sustainable fisheries. These new parameters muddy the debate while painting an overly optimistic picture of the current state of fisheries. The Commission highlights steady increases in the number of fishing limits set in line with the legal requirements of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), citing very high percentages when expressed in terms of total catches or landings. Despite those numbers, many species still are not fished in line with the scientific advice.

The Commission also proposed a two-tiered approach for different stocks when setting 2019 catch limits, depending on their commercial importance or abundance. For stocks considered by-catch, it will “take into account” the scientific advice but also such factors as their lower commercial importance and the desire to keep fisheries for other species open. This could lead to overfishing of some by-catch stocks, which could harm the ecosystem.

This double standard will likely mean the EU will continue to make progress in the sustainable management of some stocks but not others. Those that are commercially important and that benefit from comprehensive scientific data may see improvements, but others that are overfished, less economically valuable, or simply less understood may not reach the CFP objective of ending overfishing by 2020.

The policy changes mean that in some cases, the well-established precautionary approach—which requires greater caution when there is uncertainty—is effectively being reversed: More risks would be taken when stock status is less clear. This ultimately translates into higher fishing pressure on stocks that have less data compared with well-understood stocks. In addition, allowing more flexibility on catch limits when less is known about a stock also gives member States little incentive to gather better data for those stocks.

Efforts to make CFP requirements less stringent have been a persistent problem and, in some instances, have been legislated in new multi-annual fisheries plans for each region. The European Parliament and Council recently approved a plan for the North Sea that makes a similar distinction on by-catch stocks, setting lower objectives for their management.

The EU deserves praise for the progress made so far to prevent stock collapse and begin reversing overfishing trends. However, the painfully slow steps toward delivering the CFP’s legal requirements of fishing sustainably and rebuilding fish stocks to sustainable levels leaves much work to be done in the next two years.

The Commission concludes its Communication by emphasising that “this is no time for complacency.” This also is no time to water down the EU’s policy objectives or exempt “difficult cases” from legal requirements when fisheries ministers make crucial decisions on 2019 limits between October and December.

Andrew Clayton directs The Pew Charitable Trusts’ efforts to end overfishing in Northwestern Europe.

European overfishing
European overfishing
Event

Countdown to 2020 How Far Has the EU Come in Ending Overfishing

Quick View
Event

Countdown to 2020 How Far Has the EU Come in Ending Overfishing

On Wednesday, 21 February 2018, The Pew Charitable Trusts hosted an all-day conference, “Countdown to 2020: How Far Has the EU Come in Ending Overfishing?” in Brussels. 

Fishing nets
Fishing nets
Issue Brief

EU Needs Swift Progress to End Overfishing by 2020 Deadline

Quick View
Issue Brief

EU Needs Swift Progress to End Overfishing by 2020 Deadline

In 2013, decision makers in the European Union agreed to far-reaching reforms to their Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and set overarching goals for restoring fish stocks in EU waters. The new CFP included a legally binding commitment to end overfishing by 2015 where possible, and by 2020 at the latest, so that stock biomass—the total weight of a fish population—can be restored and maintained above sustainable levels.

Marine life
Marine life
Fact Sheet

10 Reasons to End Overfishing in Europe

Quick View
Fact Sheet

10 Reasons to End Overfishing in Europe

Management of fisheries in the European Union has improved over the past 15 years, but the fishing limits set by EU fisheries ministers too often exceed the levels advised by scientists. That prevents Europeans from realising many of the benefits of sustainable, productive fish stocks and fisheries.