Residual Vote Rate in Georgia Reveals Ballot Error

Residual Vote Rate in Georgia Reveals Ballot Error

A ballot-labeling error in a Fulton County, Georgia, commissioners’ race was discovered when a consultant for the county election office identified a 4,200-vote drop-off in the contest for the commission chairman. 

A lawsuit, filed by the losing candidate against the county Department of Registration and Elections, alleges that because the ballot did not include a descriptor, such as “chairman,” to designate its importance, it confused voters, causing them to skip that race on the ballot.

The voter drop-off is often called the residual vote rate. Pew’s Elections Performance Index calculates the residual vote rate in each state as the percentage of ballots cast in a particular election that contained either an undervote (i.e., no vote) or an overvote (i.e., more than one candidate marked in a single-winner race). The Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project pioneered the measure of residual vote rate as a way to identify malfunctioning voting equipment or poor ballot design.

It is rare that such a technical measure makes the news, but the Fulton County commission race is an example of its usefulness in detecting problems in real elections. In this instance, the error resulted in a legal challenge to the race, which was dismissed because the judge believed that the ballot mistake impacted both candidates equally.

Follow us on Twitter using #electiondata and get the latest data dispatches, research, and news by subscribing today.

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.