Ways to Make the Juvenile Legal System Better Serve Young People and Communities

Collected Pew research and policy recommendations show how state leaders are reimagining how to reduce youth confinement and protect public safety

Making the Juvenile Legal System Better Serve Young People
Students gather in a brightly lit hallway between classes, some walking with backpacks and others leaning against green walls, chatting with friends.
Maskot Getty Images

Editor’s note: This page was updated Feb. 7, 2024, with descriptive wording corrections throughout.

A juvenile court’s decision to remove young people from their homes and place them in state-funded residential facilities in response to delinquent behavior generally fails to reduce future crime. And, in many cases, that action will increase children's likelihood to re-offend or drop out of school. Data also shows that residential placement and its corresponding impacts fall disproportionately on children of color compared with White children. Rather than spending tens, and sometimes hundreds, of thousands of dollars per child annually for disappointing results, policy leaders are increasingly advancing options supported by the public to protect public safety, ensure accountability, contain corrections costs, and improve outcomes for youth and their communities.

Between 2012 and 2023, The Pew Charitable Trusts helped eight states—Georgia, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia—apply data and research in support of sweeping juvenile legal system changes. These efforts included limiting detention and residential placement to those circumstances that pose the greatest public safety risk, restricting the length of any such confinement, and reinvesting the savings in community-based responses shown to reduce recidivism. And these efforts produced results. For example, in the two years after Kansas adopted a slate of reforms in 2016, the out-of-home population fell 63%, allowing the state to shift tens of millions of dollars to fund evidence-based interventions in every one of its judicial districts. Youth arrests in Kansas fell by double-digit percentages in the years after reform. Kentucky and Utah also achieved rapid reductions in placement while protecting public safety.

This string of successes shows that state governments can undertake reform measures spanning the entirety of the youth justice system—from before young people are arrested to how and when they exit the system—and contribute to decades of reductions in youth confinement as well as youth crime. The work in these eight states offers policymakers, practitioners, and advocates a roadmap to adopting comprehensive changes in their own jurisdictions that protect public safety, ensure accountability, and reduce the footprint of the juvenile legal system.

Inmate behind fence
Inmate behind fence
Article

Juvenile Justice Reforms Could Reduce Pandemic's Impact

Quick View
Article

As COVID-19 spreads among youth and staff in juvenile correctional facilities, some states are moving to reduce confined populations. Although motivated by urgent health concerns, many of these policies are consistent with public safety research and reflect a continuing effort by state policymakers to decrease both incarceration and crime.

Issue Brief

Re-Examining Juvenile Incarceration

Quick View
Issue Brief

A growing body of research demonstrates that for many juvenile offenders, lengthy out-of-home placements in secure corrections or other residential facilities fail to produce better outcomes than alternative sanctions.

Article

How State Reform Efforts Are Transforming Juvenile Justice

Quick View
Article

Since 2012, a growing number of states have used data and research to inform sweeping policy changes that aim to improve juvenile justice systems. Their efforts include prioritizing use of detention and out-of-home placement for youth who present the greatest public safety risk, limiting the length of their confinement, reinvesting taxpayer savings to expand access to evidence-based services, and supporting community-based interventions for lower-level offenses.

Article

States Take the Lead on Juvenile Justice Reform

Quick View
Article

Juveniles in the U.S. are much less likely to be arrested for violent crime and committed to state custody than they were 15 years ago. From 2001 to 2014, the juvenile violent crime arrest rate fell 46 percent and, over roughly the same period, the rate at which youths were sent to state-funded facilities dropped 53 percent.

OUR WORK