The Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative in Rhode Island

The Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative in Rhode Island

This page was updated on Dec. 17, 2019, to note the conclusion of the state’s work with the Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative.

Background

In March 2013, the Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative partnered with Rhode Island to establish a cost-benefit analysis methodology that would examine policies and procedures in the state’s criminal justice system. Rhode Island leaders recognized Results First as a guided approach to assessing the long-term investment value of their publicly funded programs. The Rhode Island Results First work was led by the state’s Office of Performance Management, housed within the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which uses data to review and improve the efficiency and outcomes of government programs. The OMB oversaw the development and use of the Results First approach, including statewide inventories of programs implemented by agencies and the state-specific cost-benefit model.

Implementation

The OMB published comprehensive inventories of state-funded adult criminal justice and juvenile justice programs in March 2014. The team also released a 2015 report comparing the costs associated with adult and juvenile recidivism with the relatively high costs of providing programs in the state. By comparing programs’ expected recidivism reduction with per-participant costs, the analysis ranked programs by cost-effectiveness and identified ways to improve value. The report made several recommendations to address cost-effectiveness, such as increasing the number of participants to lower per-participant program costs, collaborating across departments to reduce duplication of efforts, and reviewing contract terms with providers.

In May 2016, the OMB released a report after conducting cost-benefit analysis on 11 evidence-based programs in state prisons or for individuals on probation or parole. Ten programs demonstrated a positive return on investment. Based on these results, the report announced an increased focus of state resources on evidence-based programs and highlighted specific recommendations for cost-beneficial programs in the governor’s fiscal year 2017 budget proposal, including $2.5 million for medication-assisted treatment for substance use disorder in state prisons.  

The OMB released a 2017 report summarizing its work with the Department of Children, Youth, and Families and the Department of Health to inventory and assess the state’s investments in child welfare programming. The state administers 11 evidence-based programs that are shown to be effective or promising. OMB staff conducted cost-benefit analysis on six of these programs, two of which were projected to produce positive returns on investment. OMB then made several recommendations, including that the state invest in additional evidence-based programs and that programs be regularly reviewed to ensure that they are being implemented as designed.

Learn more about our state work.

 

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

Resources for federal, state, and local decision-makers

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.