Alaska Tribes Urge Bureau of Land Management to Protect Critical Lands and Waters

Intact landscapes are vital for wildlife, fighting climate change, and subsistence way of life

Navigate to:

Alaska Tribes Urge Bureau of Land Management to Protect Critical Lands and Waters
A river with trees in the background during a sunset.
The sun sets over Otter Creek, a tributary to the Anvik River in Alaska. The area could be threatened if the U.S. government reopens it to mining.
David W. Shaw

The fate of many large landscapes and diverse, intact ecosystems across Alaska could soon be decided by the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which will identify which ancestral lands will remain protected from some forms of mining. Those lands are currently protected by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) public land orders and are sometimes referred to as “D-1 lands” because they’re covered under Section 17 D-1 of the act. 

D-1 lands, which have a long and complex management history, include critical watersheds with highly productive salmon streams, caribou calving grounds, tundra landscapes, coastal estuaries, moose habitat, and marshes important to migratory birds. These lands are also hunting, fishing, and gathering grounds for more than 100 Indigenous Alaska communities and include areas that border national parks, wildlife refuges, and the Bering Sea.

A river flows through a vast landscape. Overhead, the sun is covered with clouds.
The Yukon River flows through the traditional lands of 73 Tribes in Alaska, and much of this land is covered by D-1 public land orders. Various factors, including climate change, are affecting the river’s salmon populations, and safeguarding critical watersheds will help mitigate these impacts.
The Pew Charitable Trusts

D-1 public land orders can be lifted only by the secretary of the interior following recommendations from a BLM resource management plan or an environmental impact statement (EIS). BLM has finalized five management plans that have recommended lifting all D-1 protections from BLM-managed land in areas across Alaska. Most of those plans were completed decades ago and unfortunately did not consider impacts from climate change nor the impacts to Indigenous communities. So the Biden administration announced this EIS process to analyze impacts and make recommendations to the secretary of the interior.

A map of Alaska showing lands and rivers. The lands are light green and the rivers are dark blue. Certain lands that could lose protections are colored a rusty orange and thick, brown lines indicate planning area boundaries.

Because of the D-1 land’s significance to Indigenous Alaskans’ way of life, 78 Alaska Tribes asked BLM on Oct. 19 to retain the D-1 protections. In the letter to the secretary of the interior and the BLM Alaska director, the Tribes identified severe impacts already experienced from climate change, such as increased coastal and river erosion, increasing river temperatures, changing migration routes, and significantly lower salmon returns. Because of these climate-related impacts, Tribes noted the increased importance of the habitat that supports subsistence resources and other culturally significant areas and asked for these lands to be protected.   

D-1 lands support large contiguous landscapes that Indigenous Alaskan communities have used for millennia, the same lands and waters that fish and wildlife need to feed, raise young, and migrate. An increasing body of scientific evidence also shows that healthy natural habitats can help flora and fauna adapt to our rapidly changing environment. In Alaska’s Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, subsistence hunters, fishers, and foragers have been asked for years to harvest less to preserve species. As climate change continues to increase pressure on resources, Tribes believe it is in the public interest to protect intact landscapes and pristine waters as a precautionary approach to preventing further declines in species.

A caribou eats red, orange, and yellow plants on the ground on a fall day.
Lifting protections on public lands in Alaska could affect critical caribou habitat.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Now, as the Biden administration is preparing to release its draft EIS, Pew joins the 78 Alaska Tribes in urging the BLM and the Department of the Interior to consider concerns of the Tribal communities that know these lands intimately. BLM should safeguard Indigenous peoples’ traditional landscapes, which include millions of acres of pristine lands and waters. Such protection would help native plants and animals thrive through the impacts of climate change and ensure that Indigenous communities can carry on the lifeways that have sustained them for millennia.

Suzanne Little works on the U.S. conservation project.

Spotlight on Mental Health

Tundra in the Ray Mountains, Alaska
Tundra in the Ray Mountains, Alaska
Issue Brief

Will the Government Retain Protections on Alaska?

Quick View
Issue Brief

Since 2016, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service have advanced five efforts that would dramatically alter protections for some 60 million acres of federally managed land in Alaska.

David Shaw
Smokehouse
Issue Brief

Bering Sea Western Interior at Risk of Resource Extraction

Quick View
Issue Brief

Since 2016, the U. S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service have advanced five efforts that would dramatically alter protections for some 60 million acres of federally managed land in Alaska.

Sunray
Sunray

Biden's Chance to Work With Tribes on Alaska Public Lands

Quick View

Since 2016, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service have advanced five land management plans that would eliminate protections for the roughly 60 million acres of federally managed lands—the most of any state—in Alaska. If enacted, the Alaska plans would open vast stretches of the Bering Sea-Western Interior, Tongass National Forest, Central Yukon, National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, and other pristine landscapes to extractive development with significant potential repercussions for lands, rivers, wildlife in Alaska, and the Indigenous peoples whose lives and culture are intrinsically connected to these places.

Chalkyitsik visitors
Article

Alaska’s Eastern Interior

Quick View
Article

Alaska’s Eastern Interior encompasses 6.5 million acres of public land, much of it remote, pristine boreal forest and tundra. These rugged landscapes include White Mountains National Recreation Area and support dozens of vast river watersheds, such as the Fortymile and the Draanjik, that are vitally important to local tribal communities.

Composite image of modern city network communication concept

Learn the Basics of Broadband from Our Limited Series

Sign up for our four-week email course on Broadband Basics

Quick View

How does broadband internet reach our homes, phones, and tablets? What kind of infrastructure connects us all together? What are the major barriers to broadband access for American communities?

Pills illustration
Pills illustration

What Is Antibiotic Resistance—and How Can We Fight It?

Sign up for our four-week email series The Race Against Resistance.

Quick View

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, also known as “superbugs,” are a major threat to modern medicine. But how does resistance work, and what can we do to slow the spread? Read personal stories, expert accounts, and more for the answers to those questions in our four-week email series: Slowing Superbugs.