Fishery Management Proposal Threatens Healthy Oceans

Fishery Management Proposal Threatens Healthy Oceans

A Pacific coast rockfish.

After decades of overfishing, many U.S. fish populations are finally rebounding to abundant levels. But a proposal from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Marine Fisheries Service could undercut gains made to date and threaten future progress toward fully sustainable U.S. fisheries.

The proposed rule would weaken implementation of key parts of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the primary law that governs management of U.S. ocean fish, through revisions to a set of NOAA Fisheries’ guidelines called National Standard 1. Those measures provide important direction for regional fishery managers on how to prevent overfishing, rebuild overfished stocks, and achieve science-based catch levels that benefit the nation.

Unfortunately, the proposal would promote practices that increase the risk of overfishing. Among other concerns, fishery managers would be able to delay lowering catch limits, even when the best scientific information indicates that such action is necessary.

The proposal would allow fishery managers to keep using clearly deficient plans for rebuilding overfished stocks to healthy levels, instead of fixing those plans to accelerate the restoration of imperiled populations. And the proposal would change the criteria that determine if fish species are managed under the Magnuson-Stevens Act, thus enabling fisheries managers to exclude stocks that are caught by fishermen or are important to ocean ecosystems. 

The proposal also misses an opportunity to address growing pressure on fish from changing ocean conditions and fails to advance policies that consider the interactions between fish and other marine life. There is a growing consensus that a more comprehensive approach to fishery management can help safeguard ocean resources and support coastal communities.

But instead of raising the bar, this proposal lowers it and would lead to risky fish management. We can’t go down that road.

A public comment period runs through June 30. Please join me in urging the agency to ensure sustainable fisheries management for today’s fishermen and generations to come. You can weigh in by clicking here.

Ted Morton directs The Pew Charitable Trusts’ efforts to establish policies to end overfishing; rebuild depleted fish populations; and promote a more comprehensive, ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management in U.S. federal waters.

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

Resources for federal, state, and local decision-makers

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.

Atlantic Cod
Atlantic Cod
Issue Brief

Lowering the Bar

Proposed national fishery management rule threatens healthy oceans

Quick View
Issue Brief

A proposal released in January 2015 by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) would weaken implementation of key parts of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the primary law governing management of U.S. ocean fish.