Wait Times in the District of Columbia

Wait Times in the District of Columbia

In the 2014 general election, the District of Columbia Board of Elections did something fairly unique: It measured how long voters were waiting to cast ballots. And it did this by simply observing and timing people at polling places.

The city’s After-Action Report on the election describes the deployment of data collection teams to five of the busiest polling places to see how long it took people to go through the process of checking in, obtaining a ballot, and casting their votes. The results varied depending on which voting system was used:

  • Voters using paper ballots, which are optically scanned and counted, needed an average of 8 minutes and 40 seconds to complete the voting process.
  • Those using electronic touch-screen machines took 12 minutes and 12 seconds.
  • Those who had to cast special, or provisional, ballots—due to questions about their eligibility or because they were registering to vote on Election Day—spent 14 minutes and 45 seconds at the polls.

Additional detail shows that almost half the time that was required to cast a touch-screen ballot—approximately 5½ minutes—was spent waiting in line for a machine after checking in. Voters using paper had to wait in line only 30 seconds to receive their ballots. However, it took voters a little more than four minutes to complete a paper ballot compared with less than three for touch-screen voters.

Elections officials also noted that special ballots posed a particular challenge because the city issues these at one of the highest rates in the country.

The Board of Elections has said it will use this information to plan for the 2016 presidential election.

Follow us on Twitter using #electiondata and get the latest data dispatches, research, and news by subscribing today.

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.