Policy Change Affects Provisional Ballot Use

District of Colombia

Policy Change Affects Provisional Ballot Use

Return to Election Data Dispatches

Pew’s recently released Elections Performance Index incorporates data from the 2012 election and finds that use and rejection of provisional ballots increased, on average, since the 2008 election. Evidence from the District of Columbia and Washington state demonstrates that policy changes can affect patterns of provisional ballot use.

The district’s rate of provisional ballots issued out of all ballots cast more than doubled between 2008 and 2012, the largest increase in the nation. This was primarily due to sweeping legislation that allowed eligible city residents to register to vote or change their registered address at the polls on Election Day. The way the law was implemented required individuals registering on Election Day to complete a provisional ballot and use the provisional ballot envelope to indicate their desire to register.

Washington state recorded a significant decrease in its rates of provisional ballots both issued and rejected out of all ballots cast in 2012. In fact, the state had the largest decrease in provisional ballots issued and the third-largest decrease in provisionals rejected.

Two factors played significant roles in these decreases:

  • First, the state shifted to entirely vote-by-mail elections in 2012. In 2008, King and Pierce counties still had in-person Election Day voting, and the two counties combined for nearly 44,000 provisional ballots cast, more than 80 percent of the state’s 54,000 provisional ballots. After these counties became the last to offer all vote-by-mail, their totals dropped to approximately 2,500 provisional ballots cast in 2012, about 35 percent of the state’s 6,800 provisional ballots issued.
  • Second, the state changed how it handled replacement ballots. In the past, voters from one county who showed up in another county’s elections office on Election Day because they had not received their mail ballots, were given provisional ballots. In 2012, a new electronic system changed that process to allow those voters to cast regular ballots. The state already had an electronic process, commonly known as an eballot system, in place for military and overseas voters, and it asked counties to use the same program for all voters in 2012. This made it possible for voters who had moved since the 2008 presidential election but had not updated their registration address to access their ballots.

Follow us on Twitter using #electiondata and get the latest data dispatches, research, and news by subscribing today. 

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.