Stakeholders Stress Need for Clean Energy Finance Tool

Following the reintroduction of the Master Limited Partnerships Parity Act in the U.S. House and Senate this year, key congressional committees are considering whether to extend access to this financing tool to clean energy technologies. 

More than $468 billion has been invested in master limited partnerships, or MLPs, since the 1980s for incumbent energy technologies such as oil and gas exploration and pipeline construction. Clean energy leaders say the partnerships also can benefit their sector, where access to lower-cost capital is critically important to secure private investment.

A master limited partnership is a business structure that has the tax advantages of a partnership but whose ownership equity can be traded as easily as public stock. Energy projects qualifying as master limited partnerships have access to low-cost capital and liquid investment opportunities, as well as a relatively high rate of return for investors. Master limited partnerships have existed since 1981 and are available to investors in fossil-fuel extraction and pipeline projects.

On Aug. 7, The Pew Charitable Trusts hosted a webinar about the potential for MLPs in the clean energy sector that included leading investors, manufacturers, and energy producers. Although solar, wind, and industrial efficiency representatives said they would use the partnerships in different ways, each confirmed that allowing their businesses to have access to this tool could provide significant benefits.

Stakeholders Stress Need for Clean Energy Finance Tool

“Master limited partnerships are a proven tool that has attracted a very significant amount of capital to energy infrastructure, with total market capitalization now at $468 billion,” said Steven Berkenfeld, managing director at Barclays Capital. “They have provided enormous benefits to asset development and to the sponsors and owners of these assets, as well as to public investors in these partnerships, all while incurring a relatively modest cost in terms of tax revenue impact.

“Many clean energy assets also would be well suited for the MLP structure. Approval of the MLP Parity Act should attract significant new investment in these assets while also lowering the financing costs for these businesses and allowing widespread retail and institutional ownership of these projects.”

David Flitterman, chairman of North American operations for Gamesa Technology Corp., agreed. “Unlike traditional energy sources, wind energy developers cannot take advantage of MLPs, because they are only available for finite natural resources such as fossil fuels. If we truly want to leave it up to the market to drive investment decisions, then we need to ensure fairness and parity across the board for all energy sources. That means giving renewable energy sources like wind the same rights that the oil and gas industry has to access large pools of capital at a lower cost through MLPs.”

Dick Munson, senior vice president of Recycled Energy Development, added: “Access to master limited partnerships can help our company lower financing costs for industrial efficiency projects by up to 50 percent. With broader pools of capital available, technologies that capture and reuse waste heat can continue to make U.S. businesses more competitive by lowering energy costs and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

Pew and its Clean Energy Business Network are working with private-sector, labor, environmental, and other stakeholders to build support for the MLP Parity Act. The measures (S. 795 and H.R. 1696) have Democratic and Republican co-sponsors in both chambers.

“Clean energy industry leaders need policy certainty in order to make long-term investments that grow their businesses and make the United States more competitive in the global clean energy race,” said Phyllis Cuttino, director of Pew's clean energy program. “Extending clean energy technologies the same tax treatment already enjoyed by incumbent energy technologies through access to master limited partnerships is an important component of long-term policy, including multiyear extensions of the production and investment tax credits.”

Spotlight on Mental Health

Composite image of modern city network communication concept

Learn the Basics of Broadband from Our Limited Series

Sign up for our four-week email course on Broadband Basics

Quick View

How does broadband internet reach our homes, phones, and tablets? What kind of infrastructure connects us all together? What are the major barriers to broadband access for American communities?

Pills illustration
Pills illustration

What Is Antibiotic Resistance—and How Can We Fight It?

Sign up for our four-week email series The Race Against Resistance.

Quick View

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, also known as “superbugs,” are a major threat to modern medicine. But how does resistance work, and what can we do to slow the spread? Read personal stories, expert accounts, and more for the answers to those questions in our four-week email series: Slowing Superbugs.

Explore Pew’s new and improved
Fiscal 50 interactive

Your state's stats are more accessible than ever with our new and improved Fiscal 50 interactive:

  • Maps, trends, and customizable charts
  • 50-state rankings
  • Analysis of what it all means
  • Shareable graphics and downloadable data
  • Proven fiscal policy strategies


Welcome to the new Fiscal 50

Key changes include:

  • State pages that help you keep track of trends in your home state and provide national and regional context.
  • Interactive indicator pages with highly customizable and shareable data visualizations.
  • A Budget Threads feature that offers Pew’s read on the latest state fiscal news.

Learn more about the new and improved Fiscal 50.