Oregonians Say They Want More Land and Water Protections

Oregonians Say They Want More Land and Water Protections

Western Oregon is home to incredible ancient forests, rare plants, wild salmon populations, and outstanding recreational opportunities. Thanks to a mosaic of micro-climates that create rain forests and dry pine forests, oak savannas, and alpine grasslands, these lands are also some of the most unique and biologically diverse in the United States.  

Much of that land is in a special class commonly known as O&C lands. In 1866, Congress established a land-grant program for the Oregon & California Railroad Co. to spur completion of the rail line between Portland and San Francisco. The grant, which was intended to foster settlement and economic development, required the railroad company to sell the deeded land to settlers. Forty years later, after the company failed to fully meet the terms of the agreement, the federal government reclaimed more than 2 million acres of mostly forested land. Today, those O&C lands are administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service. Policymakers and Obama administration officials at all levels have discussed various options for managing these public lands, which include some of the nation's oldest forests and have provided revenue from logging for rural communities in western Oregon.

Last fall, The Pew Charitable Trusts joined conservation groups, timber representatives, and county commissioners on a panel convened by Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber to seek a solution to this long-standing management issue. The ideas that came out of several months of meetings will help inform federal legislation on this issue. To bring the opinions of local communities into the conversation, Pew commissioned a bipartisan statewide poll of likely voters in western Oregon on the O&C lands issue.

To find out which issues are most important to voters in the final management of O&C lands, they were given four issues to consider. Voters were asked to pick their top two priorities regarding the management of O&C lands.

  1. Stabilizing funding for local governments.
  2. Ensuring the future of logging jobs and the timber economy. 
  3. Protecting places to hunt, fish, hike, swim, and enjoy the outdoors. 
  4. Protecting old-growth forests, bodies of water, and the wildlife that live there. 

Voters Say Protecting Public Lands and Water Is Top Priority

Voters' management priorities

The results are telling. Voters, both statewide and in the target counties1, believe that “protecting old growth forests, bodies of water, and the wildlife that live there” is the top priority. “When we asked Oregon voters to prioritize timber jobs and revenue for counties with protections for clean water, ancient forests, and wildlife, a solid majority told us that protection for land and water is most important to them,” said Lisa Grove of Anzalone Liszt Grove Research. (Public Opinion Strategies conducted the polling along with Grove's firm.)

1. The poll oversampled four Oregon counties—Douglas, Jackson, Josephine, and Lane Counties—that contain large pieces of O&C lands and are in serious financial straits due to a lack of revenue from timber harvest. These four counties are identified as “target counties” in the poll results.

The poll also asked voters to choose between two management plans for the O&C lands. 

Plan One

Plan Two

Allow for logging on 20 percent of the O&C public lands.    Allow for logging on roughly 60 percent of the O&C public lands.  
Produce $40 million in annual revenue for local governments. Produce $165 million in annual revenue for local governments.
Protect wild salmon and other types of threatened wildlife on virtually all of the wildlife habitats that could be impacted by logging. Protect salmon and other types of threatened wildlife on less than half of the wildlife habitats that could be impacted by logging.  

Plan One represents an ecological forestry-based approach in which approximately 500,000 acres would be managed for both timber harvest and conservation values. Clean drinking water, wild salmon and other wildlife, ancient forests, and wilderness areas would be protected from clear-cutting. Plan Two is an approach similar to the Trust Proposal of U.S. Representatives Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Greg Walden (R-OR), and Kurt Schrader (D-OR). That proposal would place more than 1.5 million acres of public forests into a trust managed by timber and local representatives.

Voters Favor Plan One Over Plan Two

The survey found that voters favor Plan One by a strong majority (61 percent favor, 29 percent oppose) but are divided over Plan Two (45 percent favor, 46 percent oppose). Breaking down the responses by region, more voters in the four target counties (Douglas, Jackson, Josephine, Lane) favor Plan One (60 percent favor, 28 percent oppose) than favor Plan Two (44 percent favor, 44 percent oppose).

When asked to choose between the two plans, a nearly 2-1 majority favored the ecological forestry-based plan. Support for Plan One cut across demographics—gender, age, and political affiliation—with majorities favoring conservation of the state's natural resources over more logging.

Voters support plan one

 

One thing is clear from this poll: Oregonians understand the importance of and want to protect the clean drinking water, ancient forests, wilderness, and wild salmon of the O&C lands. Pew is working with local stakeholders and members of Congress to ensure the protection of these lands and water as a legacy for our children and grandchildren.  

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.