Provisional Ballots in Ohio, Part 2

Provisional Ballots in Ohio, Part 2

previous data dispatch examined the number of provisional ballots cast and counted in Ohio in 2009 and 2011. Data recently released from the state’s March 2012 primary sheds more light on the process in the Buckeye State.

While most states collect and share data on the total number of provisional ballots issued, how many are rejected, and why, it is typically difficult to find out why these ballots were issued in the first place. Knowing the reasons voters need provisional ballots can provide a fuller picture of how these ballots are administered in a state and in individual counties. Ohio has been sharing these data on its website since 2011.

During the March 2012 primary, Ohio issued 20,062 provisional ballots (and more than 87 percent—approximately 17,500—of these were counted). The state’s data reveal two major reasons these ballots were issued:

  • Nearly half of all provisional ballots in the state were issued to voters who had moved to a new precinct within the same county.
  • About 15 percent of the ballots were provided because a voter had already requested an absentee ballot.

However, the county-level data show that the second reason, above, is driven by one jurisdiction - Cuyahoga County. The most populous of Ohio’s 88 counties with almost 12 percent of its registered voters, Cuyahoga County accounted for nearly 70 percent of the state’s provisional ballots issued due to prior absentee ballot requests. Within the county itself, these ballots made up half of the provisional ballots issued. In no other county did this reason account for more than 12 percent of provisional ballots issued.

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.