Trust Magazine

Informing the Public

In this Issue:

  • Winter 2019
  • In Philadelphia, a Wellspring for Artistic Creativity
  • Inspired by the Power of Knowledge
  • The Big Picture
  • Noteworthy
  • Teens and Their Cellphones
  • Dispatch: Key to Healthy Fisheries
  • Stateline: Movement Motivator
  • 'Defining the Universe' Is Essential with Survey Data
  • Q&A: Science-Based Accord to Protect Arctic Ocean
  • States Jump at Chance to Boost Revenue with Sports Betting
  • Return on Investment
  • Improving Public Policy
  • Informing the Public
  • Invigorating Civic Life
  • End Note: A New Way to Categorize Americans by Religion
  • Progress in 2018: A Year of Working Together
  • What Is the Future of Truth?
  • View All Other Issues
Informing the Public
Trust Magazine
Some aquarium fish, like this pale pink tetra, are being modified to glow through the engineering of a fluorescence gene.

American views on news sources

In September, the Pew Research Center released an update to its annual research examining the share of Americans who get news on various social media platforms. The report found that 68 percent of U.S. adults say they at least occasionally get news on social media, though 57 percent of that group expect the news they see there to be largely inaccurate. Republicans are more negative about the news on social media than Democrats. Among Republican social media news consumers, 72 percent say they expect the news they see there to be inaccurate, compared with 46 percent of Democrats and 52 percent of independents. Even among those Americans who say they prefer to get news on social media over other platforms (such as print, TV, or radio), a substantial portion (42 percent) express this skepticism. And while 42 percent of those Democrats who get news on social media say it has helped their understanding of current events, 24 percent of Republicans say the same.

Women at the top

The Pew Research Center published a report in September finding a majority of Americans say they would like to see more women in top leadership positions in both politics and business. But most say men still have an easier path to the top and that women must do more to prove their worth. There is, however, a wide partisan gap on the issue, including on the factors that are holding women back. Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents are more than twice as likely as Republicans and those who lean Republican to say there are too few women in high political offices (79 percent versus 33 percent). While 64 percent of Democrats say gender discrimination is a major reason why women are underrepresented in these positions, only 30 percent of Republicans agree. There are also wide gender gaps in views about women in leadership. About 7 in 10 women say there are too few women in high political offices and in top executive business positions; about half of men say the same. And women are far more likely than men to see structural barriers and uneven expectations holding women back from these positions. About 7 in 10 women—versus about half of men—say a major reason why women are underrepresented in top positions in politics and business is that they must do more to prove themselves.

Americans weigh in on genetic engineering

The Pew Research Center released a report in August that found that Americans’ views on genetic engineering of animals vary widely. Presented with five scenarios that are currently available, in development, or considered possible in the future, Americans provide majority support only for the two that have clear potential to pre-empt or ameliorate human illness. Seven in 10 Americans (70 percent) believe that genetically engineering mosquitoes to prevent their reproduction and therefore the spread of some mosquito-borne diseases would be an appropriate use of technology. A 57 percent majority considers it appropriate to genetically engineer animals to grow organs or tissues that could be used for humans who need a transplant. But other uses of animal biotechnology are less acceptable to the public, including the creation of more nutritious meat for human consumption (43 percent say this is appropriate) or restoring an extinct animal from a closely related species (32 percent say this is appropriate). And one application that is already commercially available is largely met with resistance: Just 21 percent of Americans consider it an appropriate use of technology to genetically engineer aquarium fish to glow using a fluorescence gene.

Invigorating Civic Life Improving Public Policy

Spotlight on Mental Health

19x9 placeholder

Pew Research Center

Learn More
Quick View

Pew Research Center

A nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research.

Learn More
Composite image of modern city network communication concept

Learn the Basics of Broadband from Our Limited Series

Sign up for our four-week email course on Broadband Basics

Quick View

How does broadband internet reach our homes, phones, and tablets? What kind of infrastructure connects us all together? What are the major barriers to broadband access for American communities?

Pills illustration
Pills illustration

What Is Antibiotic Resistance—and How Can We Fight It?

Sign up for our four-week email series The Race Against Resistance.

Quick View

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, also known as “superbugs,” are a major threat to modern medicine. But how does resistance work, and what can we do to slow the spread? Read personal stories, expert accounts, and more for the answers to those questions in our four-week email series: Slowing Superbugs.

Explore Pew’s new and improved
Fiscal 50 interactive

Your state's stats are more accessible than ever with our new and improved Fiscal 50 interactive:

  • Maps, trends, and customizable charts
  • 50-state rankings
  • Analysis of what it all means
  • Shareable graphics and downloadable data
  • Proven fiscal policy strategies


Welcome to the new Fiscal 50

Key changes include:

  • State pages that help you keep track of trends in your home state and provide national and regional context.
  • Interactive indicator pages with highly customizable and shareable data visualizations.
  • A Budget Threads feature that offers Pew’s read on the latest state fiscal news.

Learn more about the new and improved Fiscal 50.