Trust Magazine

Employers Embrace Auto-IRAs

Surveys and early state implementation efforts show business support for retirement savings option

In this Issue:

  • Spring 2021
  • U.S. Public Opinion on the Pandemic
  • The Pandemic and the Arts in Philadelphia
  • A Time for Renewal
  • Californias Temblor Range in Bloom
  • Noteworthy
  • Online Harassment
  • A Boost for Public Safety
  • Vaccines and Misinformation
  • Antarctic Penguins Compete for Krill
  • U.S. Senate Has Fewest Split Delegations
  • States' Unemployment Systems
  • Employers Embrace Auto-IRAs
  • A Vision for Lasting Philanthropy
  • The Next Election Emergency
  • Return on Investment
  • Two Different Fonts of Information
  • View All Other Issues
Employers Embrace Auto-IRAs

Many employers that do not provide retirement benefits are signing up at the first opportunity for innovative state programs intended to help private sector workers save for their futures. In addition, responses to a survey in Oregon indicate that business owners see advantages for their employees in the state’s new individual retirement account program.

These savings programs—known as auto-IRAs because eligible workers are enrolled automatically—are public-private partnerships with state oversight and private financial firm management. They operate at no cost to employers: If businesses do not sponsor a plan of their own, employees can make regular contributions from their paychecks, with the ability to opt out at any time.

Eight states—California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Oregon, and Virginia—have adopted auto-IRA programs, and several others are considering them. Support among employers is a critical positive signal to policymakers weighing such initiatives.

Several indicators demonstrate significant receptivity among employers. In 2017, Pew surveyed small-business owners across the country, asking their opinion of a hypothetical auto-IRA program. Overall, 87% of those without their own company plan either somewhat or strongly supported such an initiative, with 27% stating that they would be very supportive.

That 2017 survey coincided with the start of the first state auto-IRA, OregonSaves, which now covers all private sector employers in the state that do not provide their own plans. Pew surveyed participating employers in 2019 and 2020 to assess how they experienced the initial registration and ongoing payroll contribution processes. Nearly 3 in 4 (73%) said they were either satisfied or neutral about the program.

OregonSaves does not charge businesses any participation fees, and 79% said they have not experienced any related out-of-pocket costs. Those that have faced additional costs said office supplies and payroll processing time were the most common. Eighty percent also said they are hearing only “a little” or “no questions at all” from their employees about OregonSaves. One reason may be that workers are offered assistance directly from the program’s client service team.

This positive reaction among employers to a no-cost retirement benefit can also be seen in California, where the Legislature approved an auto-IRA program known as CalSavers in 2016. The state had set a Sept. 30, 2020, deadline for larger employers—those with at least 100 employees—to register for CalSavers if they did not have a retirement plan of their own. As of Aug. 31, 2020, at least a month before the program’s first enrollment deadline, 2,249 firms employing nearly 100,000 workers had enrolled. More than 700 companies had started processing payroll contributions, and the program had amassed over $8.7 million in assets.

Why the demand? According to Pew’s 2017 survey, many employers want to offer retirement benefits to their workers but say they cannot because of high startup costs and limited administrative capacity. Some said they see offering retirement benefits as a way to attract and retain workers, but 67% of those who supported auto-IRAs said they felt such a program simply “would help my employees.”

Of course, business owners aren’t monolithic in their attitudes, and views on auto-IRAs run the gamut from strong backing to firm opposition. But it’s clear from the work of Pew and others that there is significant small-business support for a public-private partnership that can help employers facilitate a benefit at no cost that helps workers build a secure retirement.

John Scott is the director of The Pew Charitable Trusts’ retirement savings project.

This article was previously published on and appears in this issue of Trust Magazine.

A Vision for Lasting Philanthropy States' Unemployment Systems
Trust Magazine
Trust Magazine
Trust Magazine

Actually, Millennials Are Planning for Retirement

Quick View
Trust Magazine

Having a drink with a friend one warm evening after work in Philadelphia, Michelle Wisnieski, 28, rolls her eyes when asked about the stereotypes surrounding her generation.

Fact Sheet

Municipal Pension Funding Increased in Recent Years

Quick View
Fact Sheet

The Pew Charitable Trusts has examined funding data for 100 pension plans in 33 cities from 2015 to 2017. The analysis found a $145 billion shortfall in 2017 between assets on hand and the liabilities for promised benefits, representing an aggregate funded ratio of 68%, only slightly below the overall state pension plan funded ratio of 69%.


The American Family: The Financial Crunch of Families

Quick View

From diapers to day care and beyond, it’s getting more expensive to raise a family in the U.S. And just keeping up with daily costs makes saving for a rainy day or retirement all the harder. We speak with three families about what it takes to make it work—and what keeps them up at night.