Trust Magazine

From Research Comes Change

The William T. Grant Foundation, Pew’s partner in connecting evidence to policy and practice, has a long history of supporting science that addresses societal needs

In this Issue:

  • Fall 2022
  • Antarctic Krill
  • Follow The Facts
  • From Research Comes Change
  • How the American Middle Class Has Changed
  • How to Translate Questions for International Surveys
  • Robert Anderson “Andy” Pew
  • Conservation Can Be a Rallying Point for Our Divided Nation
  • The "Sandwich Generation"
  • Nonprofits Fill the Gap in Statehouse News Coverage
  • Follow the Facts
  • Noteworthy
  • Private Lands Are the Next Battleground
  • The Complexities of Race and Identity
  • Return on Investment
  • The FDA Needs More Information on Supplements
  • Tracking Marine Megafauna to Guide Ocean Conservation
  • When the Water Rises
  • View All Other Issues
From Research Comes Change
With its initial funding by a national chain of stores, the William T. Grant Foundation has long supported research into the needs and well-being of children. This has included funding day care centers and supporting the research of Dr. Benjamin Spock and the work of the Children’s Defense Fund.
Clockwise: Angus B. McVicar/Wisconsin Historical Society via Getty Images; Bettman/Getty Images; Cynthia Johnson/Getty Images; Hulton-Deutsch Collection/Corbis via Getty Images

For many decades of the 20th century, W.T. Grant Co. stores were common across America. The chain, which called itself “4-stores-in-one,” specialized in clothing, dry goods, home hardware, and variety items and was named for founder William Thomas Grant, an entrepreneur born in Bradford County, Pennsylvania, who spent his childhood in Massachusetts.  It was the great success of these stores—at the chain’s peak it had nearly 1,100 locations—that led Grant to establish a foundation in 1936. 

“What I have in mind,” Grant said the year he launched the Grant Foundation, “is to assist, by some means, in helping people or peoples to live more contentedly and peacefully and well in body and mind through a better knowledge of how to use and enjoy all the good things that the world has to offer them.” From its inception, the Foundation has supported research in the social sciences—its first grant went to Harvard University for a groundbreaking longitudinal study of human development that’s lasted nearly 80 years. The study has been noteworthy for its finding that the strength and happiness of people’s relationships had a positive effect on both their health and longevity—with good relationships deemed a better predictor of long lives than IQ, social class, or even genes—and that participants with a strong social support network experienced less mental deterioration as they got older.

The Foundation continued to invest in research focused on human development, education, child care, and poverty. In the 1940s, it supported efforts to improve outcomes for Black students through the United Negro College Fund and National Medical Fellowships; in the 1950s, it supported work on child mental health, development, and attachment theory, as well as Dr. Benjamin Spock’s child-rearing studies. During the 1960s, the Foundation funded research on day care and preschool in response to an increase in mothers working outside the home.

By the time of Grant’s death in 1972 (the last remaining W.T. Grant store would close a few years later), the Foundation was investing in advocacy for children and youth and had a major hand in the creation of the Children’s Defense Fund. During the 1980s and ‘90s, it explored the challenges faced by teenagers who don’t attend college—at the time some 50% of children—through its support for the Commission on Youth and America’s Future. This effort spotlighted struggles experienced by the non-college-bound population in a report that became widely known as The Forgotten Half, with findings that included the need for additional government funding and connections such as Job Corps, local youth camps, and lifelong learning programs to provide additional work opportunities.

In the 21st century, the William T. Grant Foundation has focused on two main goals, with its mission statement noting that the Foundation “invests in high-quality research focused on reducing inequality in youth outcomes and improving the use of research evidence in decisions that affect young people in the United States.”

To the William T. Grant Foundation, research evidence refers to “a type of evidence derived from studies that apply systematic methods and analyses to address predefined questions or hypotheses.” Although numerous studies point to specific conditions that support the use of research evidence in public policy or organizational decision-making, less is known about strategies to create or support those conditions. The Foundation believes that new research in this area can create avenues for engagement between researchers and decision-makers in ways that bolster research use and improve youth outcomes. Although achieving this goal is more complicated than it sounds, the William T. Grant Foundation has become known for its leadership on the topic.

“It’s one thing to know how research is used in policy and practice—to understand the conditions that enable thoughtful deliberation and sense-making of the evidence and the infrastructure that supports those conditions,” explained Vivian Tseng, the Foundation’s then-senior vice president, in a recent Foundation message. “It’s another thing altogether to create those conditions and the supporting infrastructure so that research routinely serves the public interest.”

One way the Foundation has worked to create these conditions is by nurturing a cross-pollination of research and policymaking—getting stakeholders involved in the research process earlier on and building partnerships that can integrate multiple perspectives and sources of knowledge. Another is through using key individuals and organizations as intermediaries to help nurture the engagement and relationships between researchers, policymakers, and communities. The Foundation has also funded studies of research use in policymaking to better understand how it can promote youth outcomes.

This lens on using research to create evidence-informed change is where the William T. Grant Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts intersect, with Pew also committed to applying a rigorous analytic approach to improving policy. In a new initiative, the two organizations are working together to promote and facilitate new ways to help research be more relevant to policymaking. The project has gathered and mobilized experts from around the world to identify, implement, and scale promising innovations in increasing the usefulness, inclusivity, and use of research evidence.

Launched in the fall of 2020, the project expanded the Transforming Evidence Funders Network, which connects public and private funders who are interested in supporting a closer connection between research, policy, and practice. The project also convenes the broader Transforming Evidence Network (TEN), a cross-sector community of researchers, decision-makers, and other stakeholders that works to generate and curate knowledge of effective connections between research evidence and policymaking. Of equal importance, TEN intends to build more useful research evidence for policymaking to foster greater equity, diversity, and inclusion.

The evidence project builds off the collective strengths of both organizations.

“Like the William T. Grant Foundation, Pew believes that evidence makes a difference in expanding an approach to scientific research that is inclusive of and relevant to the rest of society,” says Adam Gamoran, the Foundation’s president. “Together we convene government, civil society, and communities to shape research agendas for their needs as well as to foster the use of research to inform policy and practice to benefit society.”

Molly Irwin, Pew’s vice president of research and science, expressed a deep appreciation for the Foundation’s long history in the field. “The William T. Grant Foundation has been on the vanguard of thinking through and supporting the evidence base on how research shapes policy and government programs, and how we can do a better job of making sure that research evidence shapes policy,” she says. “It’s important work, and our evidence project partnership has benefited from all the scholarship and knowledge they bring to the table.”

Demetra Aposporos is senior editor of Trust.

How to Translate Questions for International Surveys Conservation Can Be a Rallying Point for Our Divided Nation

Spotlight on Mental Health

Jeanette Lerman-Neubauer and Joseph Neubauer.
Jeanette Lerman-Neubauer and Joseph Neubauer.
Trust Magazine

Investments Toward the Public Good

Quick View
Trust Magazine

The Neubauer Family Foundation strives to achieve transformative impact through support of the arts, Jewish causes, education, and investing in people.

Forum on Inclusive Engagement Strengthens Evidence for Policy and Practice
Forum on Inclusive Engagement Strengthens Evidence for Policy and Practice

Inclusive Engagement Strengthens Evidence for Policy

Quick View

Federal agencies can use inclusive evidence engagement—the production and use of knowledge through active collaboration among researchers, policymakers, practitioners, or communities—to generate actionable evidence, improve equity, and enhance the effectiveness of programs and policy.

Composite image of modern city network communication concept

Learn the Basics of Broadband from Our Limited Series

Sign up for our four-week email course on Broadband Basics

Quick View

How does broadband internet reach our homes, phones, and tablets? What kind of infrastructure connects us all together? What are the major barriers to broadband access for American communities?

Pills illustration
Pills illustration

What Is Antibiotic Resistance—and How Can We Fight It?

Sign up for our four-week email series The Race Against Resistance.

Quick View

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, also known as “superbugs,” are a major threat to modern medicine. But how does resistance work, and what can we do to slow the spread? Read personal stories, expert accounts, and more for the answers to those questions in our four-week email series: Slowing Superbugs.

Explore Pew’s new and improved
Fiscal 50 interactive

Your state's stats are more accessible than ever with our new and improved Fiscal 50 interactive:

  • Maps, trends, and customizable charts
  • 50-state rankings
  • Analysis of what it all means
  • Shareable graphics and downloadable data
  • Proven fiscal policy strategies


Welcome to the new Fiscal 50

Key changes include:

  • State pages that help you keep track of trends in your home state and provide national and regional context.
  • Interactive indicator pages with highly customizable and shareable data visualizations.
  • A Budget Threads feature that offers Pew’s read on the latest state fiscal news.

Learn more about the new and improved Fiscal 50.