How to Connect People in Crisis to the Care They Need

Critical questions local officials can ask to better address behavioral health emergencies

Navigate to:

How to Connect People in Crisis to the Care They Need
How to Connect People in Crisis to the Care They Need

This fact sheet is one in a series outlining questions that local officials can ask and resources they can use to prioritize potential improvements to behavioral health emergency responses.

For people experiencing mental health- or substance use disorder-related crises, jails and emergency departments have become frequent landing places. But overusing these facilities in response to behavioral health emergencies can be problematic.

Emergency room visits for mental health, substance use, or similar needs increased by more than 44% from 2006 to 2014. Although emergency department staff members are equipped to triage and stabilize individuals with acute psychiatric and medical conditions, people who need psychiatric hospitalization can end up waiting in some emergency departments for days, weeks, and even months. Those delays add to emergency room overcrowding, which overwhelms an important resource for the entire community.

Meanwhile, county jails and other correctional facilities are ill-equipped to handle the treatment needs of people with behavioral health issues, and incarceration can exacerbate certain mental health disorders. Yet jails are often filled with people whose mental health needs could be better supported elsewhere. A study of Los Angeles County jails, for instance, determined that more than 60% of their population with mental illnesses likely could have been better served by community programs, as opposed to incarceration.

Unfortunately, finding appropriate care outside of jails and emergency departments for people with behavioral health needs is extremely difficult. In 2019, national survey data showed that 57% of people with a mental illness and 80% of those with a substance use disorder did not get needed care. And according to 2019 data, the most recent available, just 28% of mental health needs are met in federally designated Health Professional Shortage Areas (communities or neighborhoods with shortages of health care professionals) throughout the 50 states.

In theory, behavioral health crises offer opportunities to help people in two distinct ways: through short-term intensive care (known as stabilization), and by connecting patients to additional care to support their long-term health and avoid future crises. Some communities have managed to do this, implementing a multistep process that aims to reach, assess, and stabilize people at the scene of an emergency; transition them to the next step of care; and ultimately connect them to sustained treatment services in their area.

But many communities face a wide range of obstacles that can prevent them from systematically building care connections. Barriers include securing funding to sustain crisis response services, adequately staffing existing and envisioned crisis centers, and engaging public health and safety personnel in coordinating successful transitions from initial encounter to crisis services. These services can range from “bridge clinics,” which help transition patients from one level of care to the next, to in-home support services that offer short-term care in a comfortable environment.

Local leaders seeking to examine and improve crisis systems can ask themselves a series of critical questions:

After the immediate emergency, what behavioral health services are available and how are they used?

By assessing community services, local leaders can uncover gaps and identify challenges and priority areas for improvement.

Related resources:

What government mechanisms exist to help sustain services and facilitate connections to care?

Existing local policies, interagency and public-private agreements, and other tools may serve as helpful foundations for communities to build on to improve and sustain funding for crisis services. Some communities have also established partnerships—with neighboring areas, state and federal agencies, private-sector actors, etc.—to make the most out of scant resources. But isolated policies can also create new barriers. For example, in rural communities where residents face challenges accessing mental health care—for reasons such as significant travel time or a dearth of clinicians—telehealth policies enacted to improve access can actually make it harder for those without reliable, affordable internet access to get help.

Related resources:

How do crisis service providers collect and analyze data, and how are data collection efforts between call centers and response teams updated to include post-crisis outcomes?

Over the course of a given behavioral health emergency, multiple agencies and service providers have the opportunity to collect valuable data. Understanding data collection and analysis protocols among local crisis services and determining how that data is shared with other agencies involved in an emergency (e.g., call centers, first responders) helps public officials determine information gaps from the initial report of a crisis to its outcome. Establishing that complete picture consistently for each emergency will allow local officials to identify trends that inform their approaches and improvements.

Related resources:

This publication is funded in part by The Pew Charitable Trusts with additional support from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

Spotlight on Mental Health


Improving Responses to Behavioral Health Emergencies

Quick View

People call 911 for many types of emergencies: a heart attack, an exploded gas line, an assault, a teenager expressing suicidal thoughts. Local 911 systems have become adept at managing the physical emergencies, coordinating medical, fire, and police teams on the fly.

Fact Sheet

Identifying and Navigating Behavioral Health Crises

Quick View
Fact Sheet

Questions local officials can ask to begin coordinating, informing, and funding improvements.

When Behavioral Health Emergencies Arise, Who Responds Can Affect Outcomes
Fact Sheet

Behavioral Health Emergencies Response Affects Outcomes

Quick View
Fact Sheet

Localities seeking to rethink the way they handle behavioral health crises also face a variety of barriers, from developing and financing these enhanced approaches to tracking outcomes.

Composite image of modern city network communication concept

Learn the Basics of Broadband from Our Limited Series

Sign up for our four-week email course on Broadband Basics

Quick View

How does broadband internet reach our homes, phones, and tablets? What kind of infrastructure connects us all together? What are the major barriers to broadband access for American communities?

Pills illustration
Pills illustration

What Is Antibiotic Resistance—and How Can We Fight It?

Sign up for our four-week email series The Race Against Resistance.

Quick View

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, also known as “superbugs,” are a major threat to modern medicine. But how does resistance work, and what can we do to slow the spread? Read personal stories, expert accounts, and more for the answers to those questions in our four-week email series: Slowing Superbugs.

Explore Pew’s new and improved
Fiscal 50 interactive

Your state's stats are more accessible than ever with our new and improved Fiscal 50 interactive:

  • Maps, trends, and customizable charts
  • 50-state rankings
  • Analysis of what it all means
  • Shareable graphics and downloadable data
  • Proven fiscal policy strategies


Welcome to the new Fiscal 50

Key changes include:

  • State pages that help you keep track of trends in your home state and provide national and regional context.
  • Interactive indicator pages with highly customizable and shareable data visualizations.
  • A Budget Threads feature that offers Pew’s read on the latest state fiscal news.

Learn more about the new and improved Fiscal 50.