Standardized Demographic Data Aids Patient Matching Rates, Study Shows

Results boost case for federal action to better link peoples’ health records

Navigate to:

Standardized Demographic Data Aids Patient Matching Rates, Study Shows
Getty Images

A new study finds that consistent use of standards for demographic data would help link patients’ records from various providers, no matter where they seek care. Many of the standards, such as the address format used by the U.S. Postal Service, are already in use in other settings, but not consistently when it comes to matching in health care.

The research, led by experts at Indiana University and supported by The Pew Charitable Trusts, was published March 8 in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. The research team assessed whether, and to what extent, the use of consistent formats for address, name, date of birth, and other demographic data yield improvements to patient matching rates. As medical providers make greater use of electronic health records (EHRs), improved matching will give them better access to the most complete and current health information on their patients.

For example, the study found that standardizing addresses using the Postal Service’s format—such as how to list street names and abbreviate certain words—can improve match rates by up to 3 percent. That figure can jump to as much as 8 percent when standard formats are used for both addresses and last names. If both of those details were standardized, an organization with a match rate of 84 percent, for example, could see the number of unlinked records halved.

Unlike many other assessments of patient matching, this study drew on tens of thousands of real-world records that had previously been matched through human review. This made it possible for investigators to confirm when standardizing certain information improved the success of a matching algorithm. They found that standardizing addresses showed the most promise for improving matching, while standard formats for telephone numbers, birth dates, and Social Security numbers made no significant difference.

These findings should inform federal government actions to improve interoperability, which is the ability of EHR systems to effectively exchange information—a priority for the Trump administration and Congress. Specifically, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) should advance the standardization of addresses. One step could be to update policies that govern how digital systems exchange information to support use of the Postal Service format. To further improve match rates, ONC should also encourage the use of additional data routinely captured in EHRs—such as email addresses—for matching.

Through those steps, the government can help ensure that different systems are using the same information in the same way. Progress on this front will help patients get the care they need, wherever they seek it.

Ben Moscovitch directs The Pew Charitable Trusts’ health information technology initiative.

Spotlight on Mental Health

Composite image of modern city network communication concept

Learn the Basics of Broadband from Our Limited Series

Sign up for our four-week email course on Broadband Basics

Quick View

How does broadband internet reach our homes, phones, and tablets? What kind of infrastructure connects us all together? What are the major barriers to broadband access for American communities?

Pills illustration
Pills illustration

What Is Antibiotic Resistance—and How Can We Fight It?

Sign up for our four-week email series The Race Against Resistance.

Quick View

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, also known as “superbugs,” are a major threat to modern medicine. But how does resistance work, and what can we do to slow the spread? Read personal stories, expert accounts, and more for the answers to those questions in our four-week email series: Slowing Superbugs.

Explore Pew’s new and improved
Fiscal 50 interactive

Your state's stats are more accessible than ever with our new and improved Fiscal 50 interactive:

  • Maps, trends, and customizable charts
  • 50-state rankings
  • Analysis of what it all means
  • Shareable graphics and downloadable data
  • Proven fiscal policy strategies


Welcome to the new Fiscal 50

Key changes include:

  • State pages that help you keep track of trends in your home state and provide national and regional context.
  • Interactive indicator pages with highly customizable and shareable data visualizations.
  • A Budget Threads feature that offers Pew’s read on the latest state fiscal news.

Learn more about the new and improved Fiscal 50.