The Cost of a Two-Tiered Election in Arizona

The Cost of a Two-Tiered Election in Arizona

Return to Election Data Dispatches.

Arizona election officials are planning to provide two types of ballots for the next election following an opinion by the state’s attorney general. In the most populous county, Maricopa, this change could cost an additional $250,000 per federal election cycle.

The opinion by Attorney General Tom Horne came in response to questions from Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett regarding a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona Inc. The court ruled 7-2 that Arizona could not require proof of citizenship from people using the federally provided national mail voter registration form but upheld a state law requiring proof of citizenship for registrants using the state form.

Horne’s opinion concludes that, under Arizona law, voters who used the federal registration form and did not prove their citizenship must be issued a ballot showing only federal races. Registrants who documented their citizenship, however, would be issued a ballot with all federal, state, and local races on it. Under the two-tiered system, each jurisdiction must print all ballots in two forms—one with only federal races and one with all races.

Election officials in Maricopa County, where more than 1.9 million of the state’s 3.2 million registered voters live, analyzed the cost and logistics of such a two-tiered voting system and estimated that it will cost at least an additional $250,000, and probably more, during the 2014 primary and general elections. The county has budgeted $3.5 million to $4 million for the 2014 election cycle.

More detailed data provided by county election staff demonstrate that:

  • Setting up and printing dual ballots for the primary election—for which 3,620 ballot styles already are necessary to accommodate 724 precincts and five recognized political parties—will cost nearly $190,000.
  • Similarly, printing dual ballots for the general election will cost the county almost $40,000.
  • Sending an informational letter to the nearly 1,000 county voters affected by the decision will cost $5,000.

According to the county, other costs not included in these estimates will push the total over $250,000. These include:

  • Printing ballots in every style for pre-election testing and duplication.
  • Changing voter look-up tools, identifying federal-only voters, and restricting their ability to request ballots in local races.
  • Hiring more staff for ballot design, proofing, and testing.
  • Providing extra training for poll workers and Election Day troubleshooters.
  • Processing more provisional ballots.

A similar two-tiered voting system is also likely to be implemented in Kansas.

Follow us on Twitter using #electiondata and get the latest data dispatches, research, and news by subscribing today.

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.