Wisconsin Election Costs

Wisconsin Election Costs

Return to Election Data Dispatches.

Democracy does have a price tag—at least for the costs of running elections. In Wisconsin, the Government Accountability Board (GAB), the state’s election agency, has made a concerted effort to collect cost data. Why? The GAB provides several reasons:

  • To help localities budget for and predict election costs and to help identify potential cost savings.
  • To allow election officials to tell the public and the state legislature what tax dollars are being spent on.  
  • In combination with other data, to help put the cost of elections in context and allow for deeper analysis.

State law requires the GAB to collect a certain amount of elections data, which they now do electronically, from Wisconsin’s 72 counties and 1,851 municipalities, and in April of this year they started to collect cost data as well.

Officials note these data may not be perfect – jurisdictions may interpret reporting instructions differently and may not provide the most up to date information. Nevertheless, Wisconsin’s effort to collect and share elections data is, to date, by far the most extensive in the country.

And what have elections cost in 2012? The state has data for three elections (data was not collected for the February primary and are not yet available for the August primary) so far this year – the April presidential primary, the May recall primary, and the June recall elections. Price tag for each - $7.6 million, $6.3 million, and $7.2 million respectively, for a total of more than $21 million. Of this $21 million, one-third, or $7 million, was spent on poll worker wages, $5.5 million on staff salaries, and nearly $2.7 million on ballots.

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.