Seventeen of America's Most Promising Scientists Selected as 2009 Pew Scholars in the Biomedical Sciences

Seventeen of America's Most Promising Scientists Selected as 2009 Pew Scholars in the Biomedical Sciences

Philadelphia, PA - The Pew Charitable Trusts today named 17 early-career scientists as Pew Scholars in the Biomedical Sciences. Scholars receive a $240,000 award over four years to help support their work, which this year includes research related to cancer, Parkinson's disease, birth defects and epilepsy. The Scholars also gain inclusion into a select community of scientists that includes Nobel Prize winners, MacArthur Fellows and recipients of the Albert Lasker Medical Research Award.

Now in its 25th year, the Program has invested more than $125 million to fund over 460 scholars.

The selection process for the Pew Scholars is rigorously competitive. Applicants must be nominated by an invited institution and must demonstrate excellence and innovation in their research. This year, 149 institutions were invited to nominate a candidate in basic biomedical research, and 111 eligible nominations were received.

“Pew is thrilled to celebrate 25 successful years for the Biomedical Scholars program,” said Rebecca W. Rimel, President and CEO of The Pew Charitable Trusts. “Not only does the program provide extraordinary scientists with the resources to carry out significant research early in their careers, it also offers them the opportunity to exchange ideas and foster relationships during the annual meetings and various networking activities. These gatherings have often led to collaborations that have resulted in significant scientific progress.”

“The Pew Biomedical Scholars are a synergistic community whose connections are reinforced over the years,” said Craig C. Mello, Ph.D., a 1995 Pew Scholar and a 2006 Nobel laureate in physiology or medicine, and the chair of the national advisory committee for the program. “I have no doubt that this immensely talented and diverse new class of Pew Scholars will have a major impact on biomedical research through their contributions as part of the Pew community and on science as a whole.”

Related Press Release: Ten Top Latin American Scientists Named 2009 Pew Fellows in the Biomedical Sciences

The 2009 Pew Scholars in the Biomedical Sciences are:

Scholar and Institution
Frank Alber, Ph.D. University of Southern California
Diana M. Bautista, Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley
Jon P. Boyle, Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh
Zev D. Bryant, Ph.D. Stanford University
Jennifer G. DeLuca, Ph.D. Colorado State University
Qing R. Fan, Ph.D. Columbia University
Kevin A. Janes, Ph.D. University of Virginia
John K. Kim, Ph.D. University of Michigan
Alexander Meissner, Ph.D. Harvard University
Charles G. Mullighan, M.D. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Patrick J. Paddison, Ph.D. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Joseph R. Pomerening, Ph.D. Indiana University
Nicholas J. Priebe, Ph.D. University of Texas at Austin
Melissa M. Rolls, Ph.D. The Pennsylvania State University
Joshua W. Shaevitz, Ph.D. Princeton University
Ben Z. Stanger, M.D., Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania
R. Grace Zhai, Ph.D. University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine

The front facade of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC.
ian-hutchinson-U8WfiRpsQ7Y-unsplash.jpg_master

Agenda for America

A collection of resources to help federal, state, and local decision-makers set an achievable agenda for all Americans

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for emerging challenges, it makes government more effective and better able to serve the public interest. In the coming months, President Joe Biden and the 117th Congress will tackle a number of environmental, health, public safety, and fiscal and economic issues—nearly all of them complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. To help solve specific, systemic problems in a nonpartisan fashion, Pew has compiled a series of briefings and recommendations based on our research, technical assistance, and advocacy work across America.

Lightbulbs
Lightbulbs

States of Innovation

Data-driven state policy innovations across America

Quick View

Data-driven policymaking is not just a tool for finding new solutions for difficult challenges. When states serve their traditional role as laboratories of innovation, they increase the American people’s confidence that the government they choose—no matter the size—can be effective, responsive, and in the public interest.