North Pacific Fishery Managers Must Improve Oversight of Transshipment

Changes would help fight illegal fishing and strengthen seafood supply chain

Navigate to:

North Pacific Fishery Managers Must Improve Oversight of Transshipment
A still from an animation depicts a blue sky with white fluffy clouds, where a small red, white, and blue fishing vessel offloads its catch to a larger gray, beige, and black carrier vessel, somewhere in a blue ocean
Transshipment is one of the most critical parts of the seafood supply chain, but when loosely governed can raise the risk of illegal products entering the supply chain. The North Pacific Fisheries Commission must strengthen management of transshipment.

Editor’s Note: This blog was updated on March 8, 2023, to accurately reflect the meeting dates. 

The North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC), one of the world’s newest regional fishery management organizations (RFMOs), is tasked with the long-term conservation and sustainable use of fisheries resources of the North Pacific Ocean. Among NPFC’s immediate priorities should be improving management of transshipment—the transfer of fish or other marine wildlife between a fishing vessel and a carrier vessel at sea or in port.

Transshipment is an important part of the global seafood supply chain but when poorly managed creates opportunities for bad actors to move illegally caught fish to market. Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, which accounts for up to US$23 billion worth of seafood annually, carries a host of negative consequences, including for law-abiding fishers, coastal communities, fisheries managers, market stakeholders, and ocean biodiversity.

Approximately 85% of fish harvested in NPFC’s waters is transshipped and the commission is far behind other RFMOs in monitoring transshipments. This is in part because NPFC has not updated the interim management measure since it was first adopted, shortly after NPFC’s inception in 2016; the commission had intended to take action on the measure at its 2022 annual meeting but that meeting was cancelled.

Now the commission has a chance to fix this. When NPFC meets in Sapporo, Japan, March 22-24 its members should strengthen transshipment management in line with other RFMOs—specifically the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), and Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC).

Doing this would also help NPFC members meet the commitments they made to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation’s Committee on Fisheries newly endorsed transshipment guidelines, which provide the commission a blueprint for safeguarding the North Pacific.

Stronger regulations would improve fisheries management

NPFC’s current interim transshipment measure was adopted more than six years ago and applies only to fish caught by its bottom fisheries—those that operate on, or very close to, the sea bottom. However, many of the culturally, economically, and ecologically important pelagic species within NPFC’s jurisdiction, such as Pacific saury and neon flying squid, are also transshipped.

The existing measure does not provide mechanisms for authorities to verify reported data on transshipment of these species, which in turn limits those authorities’ ability to monitor and control the transshipment. Further, NPFC lacks a regional observer program—an essential management tool that many other RFMOs use to ensure independent onboard monitoring of fishing activities.

Recognizing these deficiencies, NPFC members agreed in 2019 to develop a proposal to reform transshipment management and close several loopholes in the policy. To ensure adequate oversight, NPFC members should update the existing measure to improve vessel authorization processes, verify carrier vessel activities, increase observer coverage onboard all vessels involved in transshipping, and require real-time submission of data—ideally immediately after a transfer of catch occurs.

Data sharing can improve understanding of transshipment of non-NPFC managed species

In addition to adopting a new transshipment measure, members and the NPFC Secretariat should create a data-sharing agreement with the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), given the millions of square kilometers of overlapping management areas of these two RFMOs. In recent years, satellite data has shown high levels of carrier vessel activity in the WCPFC/NPFC overlap area, raising concerns that unreported or misreported transshipments could be occurring in this area. The lack of transshipment notification requirements for authorized carrier vessels in these dually managed waters, coupled with the lack of an information-sharing agreement between the WCPFC and the NPFC, limits both RFMOs’ understanding of carrier vessels’ activities in this region. These discrepancies potentially allow vessels registered to both RFMOs to transship without abiding to either’s rules for reporting. These overlap areas can also have multiple management regimes in place for the same waters, providing avenues for misreporting to one or both RFMOs. Given their large overlap, WCPFC and NPFC should collaborate and harmonize on management of these shared waters, including through increased monitoring, reporting, and data sharing of key transshipment activities.

North Pacific Fishery Managers Must Improve Oversight of Transshipment

Implementing a data-sharing memorandum of understanding (MoU) between these organizations would significantly increase transshipment oversight in these overlap areas by establishing an active and regular exchange of transshipment-related data. An MoU could also allow for the development of joint monitoring, control, and surveillance activities to ensure compliance with transshipment regulations and facilitate processes to promote compatibility of transshipment measures.

Members must seize opportunity to improve oversight

The flag States operating in the NPFC have experience with independently run transshipment observer programs, through their membership at other RFMOs or participation in existing regional programs. This provides a valuable precedent for the development and implementation of such a program for the NPFC.

At the NPFC’s annual meeting in Japan, it is up to all its members to adopt a new, more robust transshipment measure, and to enhance its effectiveness with a data sharing agreement with WCPFC. These actions are critical to improving fisheries governance in the region and would address critical gaps in monitoring and management to help ensure NPFC does not fall out of step with other managers and fisheries.

Raiana McKinney is a senior associate with The Pew Charitable Trusts’ international fisheries project.

Spotlight on Mental Health

Transshipment, pictured above, is a vital link in the seafood supply chain, but requires increased oversight in the Pacific.
Transshipment, pictured above, is a vital link in the seafood supply chain, but requires increased oversight in the Pacific.

The NPFC Should Guard Against Illegally Caught Fish

Quick View

Transshipment—the transfer of fish or other marine wildlife between a fishing vessel and a carrier vessel at sea or in port—is an important component of the global commercial fishing industry but is also rife with regulatory gaps that illegal fishers often exploit to move their catch to market.

Global Transshipment

Quick View

Global Transshipment

Transshipment, the transfer of fish or other marine wildlife between a fishing vessel and a carrier vessel at sea or in port, is an important part of the global commercial fishing industry. Valuable tuna species, mackerel, and crabs are among the freshly caught seafood transshipped each day in order to shorten the time it takes to get the fish from the sea to the store. 

Composite image of modern city network communication concept

Learn the Basics of Broadband from Our Limited Series

Sign up for our four-week email course on Broadband Basics

Quick View

How does broadband internet reach our homes, phones, and tablets? What kind of infrastructure connects us all together? What are the major barriers to broadband access for American communities?

What Is Antibiotic Resistance—and How Can We Fight It?

Sign up for our four-week email series The Race Against Resistance.

Quick View

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, also known as “superbugs,” are a major threat to modern medicine. But how does resistance work, and what can we do to slow the spread? Read personal stories, expert accounts, and more for the answers to those questions in our four-week email series: Slowing Superbugs.

Explore Pew’s new and improved
Fiscal 50 interactive

Your state's stats are more accessible than ever with our new and improved Fiscal 50 interactive:

  • Maps, trends, and customizable charts
  • 50-state rankings
  • Analysis of what it all means
  • Shareable graphics and downloadable data
  • Proven fiscal policy strategies


Welcome to the new Fiscal 50

Key changes include:

  • State pages that help you keep track of trends in your home state and provide national and regional context.
  • Interactive indicator pages with highly customizable and shareable data visualizations.
  • A Budget Threads feature that offers Pew’s read on the latest state fiscal news.

Learn more about the new and improved Fiscal 50.