Congress should reject H.R. 2304 because it would undermine the progress we've made in preventing overfishing for some of America's most valuable and vulnerable ocean fish populations.
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the federal law that governs management of our nation's ocean fish, requires managers to set science-based annual catch limits (ACLs) to ensure sustainable fishing for all federally-managed ocean fish populations by the end of 2011. The misnamed “Fishery Science Improvement Act” would jeopardize this goal and put economically and ecologically important species such as Dover sole and northern anchovy at risk by undermining the ACL requirement. Specifically, H.R. 2304 would:
Thanks to the ACL requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, managers have steadily improved data collection and analysis for species that have historically lacked assessments because they are not commercially valuable or are small fisheries. H.R. 2304 would undermine this progress by taking away the incentive for managers to collect information on these fish populations. Instead, they will likely allocate their scare research funds to those species where they are legally required to set a limit.
Congress took decisive bipartisan action in 2006 to end decades of overfishing and restore our nation's valuable fish populations by strengthening the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. H.R. 2304 undermines science-based management and puts vulnerable fish populations at risk just as we are nearing the finish line of ending and preventing overfishing for all federally-managed fish populations. Congress should reject this short-sighted bill and instead help improve fisheries science by investing in fisheries data collection and monitoring programs.