How Pandemic Recovery Funds Are Helping States Upgrade Critical Water Infrastructure

Federal dollars offer historic opportunity to repair and replace aging systems

Navigate to:

How Pandemic Recovery Funds Are Helping States Upgrade Critical Water Infrastructure
Getty Images

The United States’ water utilities have been underfunded for decades, leaving state and local governments with significant capital needs in the years ahead to repair and replace aging drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater systems. For some states, the American Rescue Plan Act’s (ARPA’s) State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (FRF) program is helping to provide a critical down payment toward upgrading their water infrastructure.

Although this federal funding will jump-start important investments nationwide, communities will continue to face significant needs and emerging challenges—such as contaminants that pose public health concerns and climate-related physical threats—that will require ongoing funding even after the ARPA dollars are spent.

Overall, states are spending $20 billion, or 10% of their recovery fund allocations, on water-related infrastructure projects, according to The Pew Charitable Trusts’ analysis of data from the U.S. Department of Treasury. If local government spending is included, that number jumps to more than $25 billion. But spending ranges significantly among states—while some are directing funds to other priorities, 13 have budgeted an estimated 25% or more of their FRF allocations to investments in water infrastructure. That policymakers in these states are choosing to funnel such a significant percentage of discretionary ARPA dollars into water infrastructure indicates the importance to these governments of bolstering water utilities and water management systems.


Note: The map shows state government obligations only as a percentage of total ARPA Fiscal Recovery Fund allocations received by each state. Obligated funds include those reported under the water infrastructure expenditure categories as well as obligations being used for water infrastructure under the revenue replacement expenditure category.

Source: Pew analysis of data published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

The states directing the most funding to water infrastructure are primarily concentrated in two regions. They are Western states bordering the Rocky Mountains that need to bolster water supplies that have been strained by climate risks and significant population growth, and Southeastern states, where policymakers are focused primarily on serving communities that have experienced long-standing inequities and on addressing public health concerns.

In the West, Idaho has budgeted 60% of its FRF allocation for water, including $300 million in grants to communities and funding for dam and aquifer projects to support the state’s vulnerable groundwater infrastructure. Utah is making significant investments to fund water efficiency and conservation initiatives to address long-standing water supply challenges. Meanwhile, South Dakota and Montana are using their federal allocations to fund grants for water and sewer infrastructure, using population density metrics and other tools to ensure that dollars are targeted to rural communities in both states.

In the Southeast, Alabama has committed more than $600 million in grants for water infrastructure in disadvantaged communities, including $10 million for demonstration grants for wastewater projects targeting unsewered communities in what is known as the state’s Black Belt. In Mississippi, where the Jackson water crisis in 2022 highlighted infrastructure vulnerabilities, the state has committed 44% of FRF allocations for water with a priority on funding for unsewered communities and drinking water projects in rural areas. Other Southern states, such as North Carolina and South Carolina, are investing funds to incentivize inventorying of existing assets, consolidating water utilities, and improving regional coordination across systems to achieve greater economies of scale.

In addition to ARPA, the federal government has provided more than $50 billion in funding for water systems through 2026 under the bipartisan Infrastructure Investments and Jobs Act (IIJA) of 2021. In some states, however, the FRF allocations budgeted for water infrastructure are larger than the estimated funding the states will receive through the IIJA. Looking at the 13 states spending more than 25% of their flexible recovery fund allocations on water infrastructure, 11 will spend more under ARPA than the amount they are expected to receive in water infrastructure-related funding or financing through the IIJA from 2022 to 2026.

Despite the infusion of federal funds from ARPA and IIJA flowing toward drinking water and wastewater infrastructure, state capital and maintenance needs remain high. New mandates around replacing lead service lines and addressing emerging contaminants—along with climate change-related risks around flooding, storms, and drought—make clear that repairing existing and building new water infrastructure will likely remain an important consideration for states and local governments for years to come.

Stephanie Connolly is a principal associate and Aleena Oberthur is a project director with The Pew Charitable Trusts’ state fiscal policy project.

State Infrastructure Financing

Collected resources on federal funding opportunities, metrics, and financing tools

Quick View

State and local governments spend roughly half a trillion dollars annually on America’s roads, bridges, transit, and water systems, but still struggle to keep pace with needed repairs or make the significant upfront investments required to modernize public infrastructure. Most states lack the tools to track maintenance, repair, and investment needs for critical public infrastructure and, as a result, create unmonitored, long-term liabilities that could pose significant fiscal burdens in the future.


More Federal Funding Needed to Improve Drinking Water

Quick View

Water utilities throughout the United States will need to spend $625 billion over the next 20 years to fix, maintain, and improve the country’s drinking water infrastructure, according to preliminary results of a periodic assessment done by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).


States Using Pandemic Funds to Boost Critical Infrastructure

Quick View

With the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, states are continuing to use federal relief dollars to offset revenue losses experienced during the pandemic or to address its negative effects. As the economic recovery progresses, policymakers across the country are also using billions of these federal dollars to jump-start much-needed infrastructure projects to upgrade critical public services such as water supplies, broadband networks, and roadways.

Composite image of modern city network communication concept

Learn the Basics of Broadband from Our Limited Series

Sign up for our four-week email course on Broadband Basics

Quick View

How does broadband internet reach our homes, phones, and tablets? What kind of infrastructure connects us all together? What are the major barriers to broadband access for American communities?

What Is Antibiotic Resistance—and How Can We Fight It?

Sign up for our four-week email series The Race Against Resistance.

Quick View

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, also known as “superbugs,” are a major threat to modern medicine. But how does resistance work, and what can we do to slow the spread? Read personal stories, expert accounts, and more for the answers to those questions in our four-week email series: Slowing Superbugs.