The Cape Town Agreement

International standards for fishing vessels can boost safety and help identify illegal fishing

The Cape Town Agreement
Cape Town Agreement
The Pew Charitable Trusts

Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing jeopardizes the health and sustainability of the world’s fisheries, undermines the livelihoods of law-abiding fishers, and is widely associated with crimes such as piracy, human trafficking, and arms and narcotics smuggling.

Evidence shows that in an effort to maximize profits, operators who fish illegally or under-report catch often do not sufficiently invest in on-board safety equipment or abide by regulations governing vessel modifications. They may also operate for extended periods of time without undergoing safety inspections, are more apt to fish in dangerous weather, and are less likely to maintain decent working conditions.

The 2012 Cape Town Agreement, adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), outlines design, construction, and equipment standards for fishing vessels of 24 meters or more in length and details regulations that countries that are party to the agreement must adopt to protect fishing crews and observers. It also calls for harmonized fisheries, labor, and safety inspections.

The agreement will enter into force once 22 States, with an aggregate fleet of 3,600 eligible fishing vessels, become parties to it. Its implementation will complement existing treaties, like the Port State Measures Agreement, and could serve as a vehicle for mandating IMO numbers and automatic identification systems on fishing vessels. These measures would enable States to accurately identify and track vessels, improving transparency and providing a means to assess vessel safety and crew welfare.

Putting these elements in place will make it easier for countries to deter IUU fishing, identify and investigate fishers who operate illegally, and help ensure that crews have safe and decent working conditions.

The Cape Town Agreement
Ari Gudmundsson
Ari Gudmundsson
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Haakon Storhaug
Haakon Storhaug
Norwegian Maritime Authority
Libby Woodhatch
Libby Woodhatch
Seafish
Per Erik Bergh
Per Erik Bergh
Stop Illegal Fishing
Sandra Allnut
Sandra Allnutt
International Maritime Organization
Nigel Campbell
Nigel Campbell
South African Maritime Safety Authority
Ragnhildur Hjaltadóttir
Ragnhildur Hjaltadóttir
Icelandic Ministry of Transport and Local Government
Darian McBain
Darian McBain
Thai Union
Miguel Núñez Sánchez
Miguel Núñez Sánchez
Embassy of Spain in the United Kingdom
Carlos Xavier Isidoro
Carlos Xavier Isidoro
National Maritime Authority of Mozambique
Otto Noack Sierra
Otto Noack Sierra
Central American Commission of Maritime Transport

Additional Resources

Cape Town Agreement
Cape Town Agreement
Fact Sheet

The Cape Town Agreement

7 reasons to improve safety on fishing vessels

Quick View
Fact Sheet

Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing threatens the sustainability of the world’s fisheries. But it is far more than just an environmental hazard. Illegal fishing is now widely associated with crimes such as piracy, human trafficking, and arms and narcotics smuggling. The International Maritime Organization (IMO), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and International Labour Organization (ILO) have acknowledged the links between IUU fishing and crimes involving the safety and welfare of crews.

Illegal fishing
Illegal fishing
Data Visualization

How Illegal Fishing Threatens the Safety of Crews

The financial drivers behind illegal fishing can lead to poor safety and labor conditions for vessel crews. When stocks are overfished, fishers’ catch and income are reduced.

Quick View
Data Visualization

The financial drivers behind illegal fishing can lead to poor safety and labor conditions for vessel crews. When stocks are overfished, fishers’ catch and income are reduced.